Getty says “no” to AI-generated images because it doesn’t want any (more) copyright issues

It's okay to use Getty Images with edited photos or artistic images, as long as they were created by human hands.

It’s okay to use Getty Images with edited photos or artistic images, as long as they were created by human hands.
picture: Wired creators (stock struggle)

Deepfakes are no longer desirable, fakes are now miserable, and any AI-generated content will be disqualified from image hosting site Getty Images.

Getty provided a message originally sent to the site’s contributors to Gizmodo confirming that the site, effective immediately, will reject any submissions made by AI image creators. Getty specifically mentioned that any images created with popular tools like Stable Diffusion, DALL-E, and MidJourney are now prohibited.. In addition to any previous photos uploaded to the site which was Created with AI will be removed.

The move is due to open questions about copyright surrounding AI-generated images, particularly “regarding the underlying images and metadata used to deplete these models,” according to Getty Connect. Any images edited with tools like Photoshop and Illustrator are still allowed, as long as they were made by human hands.

the edge It was first reported based on comments from platform CEO Craig Peters who told the site that there are “unaddressed rights issues” regarding the art of artificial intelligence, a particular problem with web hosting that needs to maintain strict copyright control over hosted content. The CEO outlined his role in the image hosting industry, telling The Verge “Our business has never been about the ease of creating images or the resulting size. It’s about connectivity and cutting.”

Although there are still unresolved questions about how good these systems are at deception, AI image generators are becoming more and more complex. Earlier this week, OpenAI announced that the DALL-E AI image creator will be able to Editing human faces. As much as the company has said that it uses detection methods to detect any kind of violent or sexual content, there will always be images you sneak through. Getty had to Handling lawsuits on questionable copyrights in the past, so he will probably try to avoid any potential backlash in today’s uncertain environment.

People have portrayed AI-generated content as man-made, including a recent case in which a game company CEO used AI content Winning a local art competition. Alex Lazaro, a spokesperson for Getty, told Gizmodo that AI-generated content so far has been “extremely limited” within their larger library, adding that they already have “important controls” to monitor this type of content.

There is also the question of how the platform will keep track of AI-generated content. A Getty spokesperson said they maintain technology to identify the people and numbers in the photos submitted to the site. He added that they are working with the Coalition for Content Creation and Authority – or C2PA – to develop image validations for the site, though Peters told The Verge that the company will have to rely on users identifying bad images as they craft automatic filters.

But in the meantime, there are other AI-powered image generators like Stability AI stable spread It was used to create more sinister content, since the open source software has no real filter at all.

Nor does it take much to know how stable propagation depends on copyrighted material. Lexica, which hosts thousands of images generated by user prompts, is full of images that contain them Distorted watermark for Getty Images. This AI system in particular relies on data sets collected by LAION that contain billions of images taken from the Internet, according to a tech blogger. Andy Bayo. The system has reportedly combed through dozens of image hosting sites such as Pinterest, Flickr, DeviantArt, and other user-generated blogs hosted by Blogspot and Tumblr. In addition, about 35,000 photos were taken out of the 12 million photos reviewed by Baio in the LAION database from the likes of Getty Images, VectorStock and Shutterstock.

Lazaro did not say how the company planned to deal with the fact that their images are orchestrated by artificial intelligence, instead saying that they are “communicating with other companies and communities to understand their views regarding the broader landscape, how legal or regulatory bodies can address and whether we will help resolve them.” “.

Getty isn’t the only platform that blocks AI-generated images. Last year, Newgrounds became the esteemed host of content creators and one of the first platforms Ban images created by AI. Popular furry art community Fur Affinity told its users on September 5 that they would update their policy to restrict AI art, saying it “lacks artistic merit” especially as popular software tests other artists’ work to create content. This month, emerging tech hosting platform InkBlot made it clear that it also has do not forgive The art of artificial intelligence.


#Getty #AIgenerated #images #doesnt #copyright #issues

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.